Please allow me to introduce some of what passes for online “research” these days — especially within the cloistered domain of the “truth” movement [sic].
I am not sure if you were writing about how obsessed people seem to be on the topic of weather modification. It is like entertainment, to so many people. That is what I am noticing But how is it helping anyone to spend so much time chatting about weather modification? Weather modification which is not a rock solid answer to any question, and obsessing over it does nothing to help those who are in a bad situation. Also, my beef with the theory is how people insist that weather modification is rock solid because there are patents for it. You do not have to prove something works to get a patent. This is the problem with how people get led off by pied pipers.
Hi Renee and thanks for replying. I'm basically saying most of what you just wrote but just not solely focused on weather modification. "Activists" of all stripes will find whatever connection need in order to "prove" their points!
Catherine Austin Fitts will sometimes make it clear when she is speculating. She'll say something like: "Now, this is high-octane speculation, but ..." I think that is a good model for people to use. When you don't know and you are speculating (about shedding, about nanobots, about weather warfare) it is a good idea to clarify that you are speculating. Otherwise, too many people will just dismiss you as a conspiracy theorist and then dismiss anything else (perhaps factual) you say.
(Shedding and nanobots, etc., might be real but almost all of what you hear about it is just exaggeration and hearsay to get eyeballs.)
I'd like to add: Even when the "truth"/"conspiracy" crowd adds such a caveat, isn't it worth noting that their speculation is still always gloom and doom that could be avoided if only the "sheep" would "wake up." Did you ever see Fitts engage in high-octane optimism? That's partly why I stopped paying attention to her a long while back. It feels like a dead end to me.
My dad told me a long time ago, "There was set in front of Eden a Cherub with a flaming sword. There is no going back". So, while I do think "it's not nice to fool with Mother Nature", as the butter commercial says, I see the various problems of the world better explained in Genesis than by a partial explanation of collusion and graft. PS-If I gave Mickey Z a koffe once, does that make me a Mickey Z funder and therefore part of the Illuminati? Do I get a jacket for that?
Drawn like a moth to a flame. If it bleeds it leads. Weather modification.
Thanks, Renee...but I'm not fully clear on what you mean.
I am not sure if you were writing about how obsessed people seem to be on the topic of weather modification. It is like entertainment, to so many people. That is what I am noticing But how is it helping anyone to spend so much time chatting about weather modification? Weather modification which is not a rock solid answer to any question, and obsessing over it does nothing to help those who are in a bad situation. Also, my beef with the theory is how people insist that weather modification is rock solid because there are patents for it. You do not have to prove something works to get a patent. This is the problem with how people get led off by pied pipers.
Hi Renee and thanks for replying. I'm basically saying most of what you just wrote but just not solely focused on weather modification. "Activists" of all stripes will find whatever connection need in order to "prove" their points!
For sure. And I agree.
🙏
What passes for journalism often seems to be so much wordplay.
As you alluded to, two events or observations mentioned in the same sentence are not autimatically related.
Associatiin does not equal causation. Well, not unless we need it to make a point 😉
Yep, the so-called "dissidents" use the same tactics as the people they claim to be exposing because, um... "free thinking"?
Ha, this reminds me of the piece I wrote about my Mum being CO (which some people actually believed was true): https://sanefrancisco.substack.com/p/is-my-mum-controlled-opposition
Ah! I had forgotten about that excellent piece of yours, SF! And you just inspired me to add a line to my post, re: my profile pic. Thanks!
Oh, what was that? I don't geddit...
In my Substack profile pic, I only show one eye! 👁️
All suspicions are now confirmed!
😇
"Who is funding Mickey Z.?" 🤣
😇
"I will throw open the windows of heaven and pour out so much blessing that there will not be room enough to store it." (Malachi 3:10)
PERFECT ANSWER!
🙏
People like me are funding him.
💕
Expanding consciousness or echo chambers. Thank you Mickey for being part of the consciousness expansion on the planet. ❤️
Right back at ya, my friend! ❤️
Yes, I agree.
Catherine Austin Fitts will sometimes make it clear when she is speculating. She'll say something like: "Now, this is high-octane speculation, but ..." I think that is a good model for people to use. When you don't know and you are speculating (about shedding, about nanobots, about weather warfare) it is a good idea to clarify that you are speculating. Otherwise, too many people will just dismiss you as a conspiracy theorist and then dismiss anything else (perhaps factual) you say.
(Shedding and nanobots, etc., might be real but almost all of what you hear about it is just exaggeration and hearsay to get eyeballs.)
Thanks, Larry...much appreciated.
I'd like to add: Even when the "truth"/"conspiracy" crowd adds such a caveat, isn't it worth noting that their speculation is still always gloom and doom that could be avoided if only the "sheep" would "wake up." Did you ever see Fitts engage in high-octane optimism? That's partly why I stopped paying attention to her a long while back. It feels like a dead end to me.
High octane optimism is a good idea! Thanks Mickey!
🙏 💕
My dad told me a long time ago, "There was set in front of Eden a Cherub with a flaming sword. There is no going back". So, while I do think "it's not nice to fool with Mother Nature", as the butter commercial says, I see the various problems of the world better explained in Genesis than by a partial explanation of collusion and graft. PS-If I gave Mickey Z a koffe once, does that make me a Mickey Z funder and therefore part of the Illuminati? Do I get a jacket for that?
👌 👁️ 👌
(Thank you and amen, Jamie!)
Divide and conquer, no? Someone always seems willing to purity spiral in the name of division.
One by one, we can change this trend... 🙏
»We must demand a full accounting of who is funding Mickey Z«
Our crack investigative team has traced payments to Mr. Z from a walrus-themed dude ranch in Nunavut.
Hmm... it appears this is not the first suspicious report from that location... 🤔